Re: Is it time to rejoice yet?
% traceroute lists.xensource.com
traceroute to lists.xensource.com (217.147.82.46), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
…
11 host01-bcn-london.deploy.xenoserver.org (217.147.82.46) 118 ms 119 ms 119 ms
% tcptraceroute lists.xensource.com
Tracing the path to lists.xensource.com (217.147.82.46) on TCP port 80, 30 hops max
…
11 host01-bcn-london.deploy.xenoserver.org (217.147.82.46) 118.612 ms 119.550 ms 118.424 ms
12 * * *
Hmm…
Re: Is it time to rejoice yet?
Well, it certainly seems it does:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-12/msg00150.html
(I am the middle of hg cloning now of xen-3.0-testin.hg)
RRX
Comment by rrx — December 5, 2005 @ 2:14 PM |
Re: Is it time to rejoice yet?
% traceroute lists.xensource.com
traceroute to lists.xensource.com (217.147.82.46), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
…
11 host01-bcn-london.deploy.xenoserver.org (217.147.82.46) 118 ms 119 ms 119 ms
% tcptraceroute lists.xensource.com
Tracing the path to lists.xensource.com (217.147.82.46) on TCP port 80, 30 hops max
…
11 host01-bcn-london.deploy.xenoserver.org (217.147.82.46) 118.612 ms 119.550 ms 118.424 ms
12 * * *
Hmm…
Comment by taral — December 5, 2005 @ 5:03 PM |
Re: Is it time to rejoice yet?
hmmm? the fact that it’s hosted inside a Xen virtual machine should come as no surprise…
Comment by mulix — December 5, 2005 @ 6:22 PM |
Re: Is it time to rejoice yet?
Oh, that’s no surprise. I was only checking because that VM is non-responsive…
Comment by taral — December 5, 2005 @ 6:38 PM
Re: Is it time to rejoice yet?
Er, *was* non-responsive.
Comment by taral — December 5, 2005 @ 6:38 PM